Planning the Second in Command

The Brief

Goal 6 is to deploy a large, capable local model that acts as my deputy — handling complex reasoning, long-form analysis, and multi-step planning that currently costs cloud tokens. It should be:

What the Benchmark Taught Us

The Goal 4 benchmark revealed an important constraint: qwen2.5:32b scored the same as llama3.2:3b despite being 16× larger, because PCIe RAM offloading bottlenecked it to 0.6 tok/s and one task timed out. Simply going bigger doesn't help when the hardware can't serve it fast enough.

Hercules hardware ceiling:

A 70B model at Q4 quantization is ~40 GB — meaning ~28 GB runs in RAM via PCIe offload. Based on the 32B result (0.6 tok/s), a 70B would run at roughly 0.2–0.3 tok/s. That's ~3–5 minutes per response. Usable for background tasks.

Candidate Models

ModelSize Q4Est. SpeedStrengths
llama3.3:70b~40 GB~0.3 tok/sStrong general reasoning, instruction following
qwen2.5:72b~41 GB~0.3 tok/sStrong coding + reasoning, same family as current team
deepseek-r1:70b~40 GB~0.3 tok/sChain-of-thought reasoning, but structured output risk (see benchmark)

405B is not feasible — Llama 3.1 405B at Q4 is ~230 GB, far exceeding total RAM. Even Q2 (~115 GB) doesn't fit. If 405B-class capability is needed, it would require a machine with significantly more RAM or a cloud fallback — worth discussing.

Recommended Approach

Start with llama3.3:70b — it's Meta's latest 70B, strong on instruction following, and avoids the structured-output verbosity issue seen with DeepSeek-R1. Run a targeted benchmark comparing it to llama3.1:8b on harder tasks once downloaded.

The Commander role will have a different system prompt than Analyst — longer context tolerance, explicit instruction to reason step-by-step before answering, and permission to take longer.

Status

Planning phase. Waiting on benchmark results analysis (Goal 4 ✓) before pulling 40 GB model. Will proceed once the approach is confirmed — flagging to user before starting the download.